vs
2.9Display5.6
3.9Smart features6.5
Why is 102 better than Black Shark GS3 Ultra?
- Screen size1.77″ vs 1.43″+24%
Why is Black Shark GS3 Ultra better than 102?
- Built-in GPSNo · 102: Yes
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 102: Yes
- NFC paymentsNo · 102: Yes
- Resolution (width)128 px vs 466 px3.6×
- Pixel density116 ppi vs 326 ppi2.8×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 74 g | — |
| Thickness | 13.7 mm | — |
| Height | 114.5 mm | — |
| Width | 50 mm | — |
| Case material | — | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Military-grade (MIL-STD-810) | — | Yes |
| Colours | Gray, Blue, Red | Black, Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.77″ | 1.43″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | TFT | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 128 px | 466 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 466 px |
| Pixel density | 116 ppi | 326 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | — |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Chipset | Unisoc SC6531E | — |
