vs
8.8Display9.8
4.9Health tracking4.9
Why is Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 better than BT20?
Smart SQ 2.0 1.70 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is BT20 better than Smart SQ 2.0 1.70?
- Screen size1.7″ vs 1.96″+15%
- Battery capacity210 mAh vs 350 mAh+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 160 g | — |
| Strap material | Edelstahl | — |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Military-grade (MIL-STD-810) | — | Yes |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.7″ | 1.96″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 410 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 502 px |
| Pixel density | — | 331 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 210 mAh | 350 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | No |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietary OS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 6vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.48.6vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsVivo Watch 58.68.6
vsHonor Watch X5vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.48.6
vsAmazfit Bip 6vsIce Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.708.58.6vs
Ice Watch Smart SQ 2.0 1.70vsAmazfit Active 28.68.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Watch 4vsOukitel BT207.26.7