NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. 110 4G 2nd Edition vs BT103

Nokia 110 4G 2nd Edition vs Oukitel BT103

What 110 4G 2nd Edition does better (4) and where BT103 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Nokia 110 4G 2nd Edition
Nokia · 2024110 4G 2nd Edition
5.0Score
4 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
vs
Oukitel BT103
Oukitel · 2024BT103
4.5Score
4 advantages
3.3Display4.0
6.5Smart features2.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

110 4G 2nd EditionBT103
50 × 121.514.440 × 49.510.9
110 4G 2nd EditionBT103Difference
Height121.5 mm49.5 mm+72 mm
Width50 mm40 mm+10 mm
Thickness14.4 mm10.9 mm+3.5 mm
Weight94 g100 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 110 4G 2nd Edition better than BT103?

  1. LTE (cellular)Yes · BT103: No
  2. Battery capacity1,450 mAh vs 300 mAh4.8×
  3. SpeakerYes · BT103: No
  4. Weight94.5 g vs 100 g+6%

Why is BT103 better than 110 4G 2nd Edition?

  1. Resolution (width)120 px vs 320 px2.7×
  2. Pixel density111 ppi vs 260 ppi2.3×
  3. Screen size1.8″ vs 1.91″+6%
  4. Thickness14.4 mm vs 10.9 mm+32%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare