NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. 5 PEAK vs Run

Suunto 5 PEAK vs Suunto Run

What 5 PEAK does better (1) and where Run wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Suunto 5 PEAK
Suunto · 20225 PEAK
3.5Score
1 advantage≈ $170
vs
Suunto Run
Suunto · 2025Run
5.5Score
10 advantages≈ $190
Higher score
2.0Display7.1
2.3Battery life4.5
2.3Sports & outdoor3.7
2.2Build & durability4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

5 PEAKRun
43 × 4312.946 × 4611.5
5 PEAKRunDifference
Height43 mm46 mm−3 mm
Width43 mm46 mm−3 mm
Thickness12.9 mm11.5 mm+1.4 mm
Weight39 g36 g+3 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 5 PEAK better than Run?

  1. Sport profiles80 vs 322.5×

Why is Run better than 5 PEAK?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)7 days vs 12 days+71%
  2. GPS battery life20 h vs 30 h+50%
  3. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 5 PEAK: Yes
  4. Dual-band GPSNo · 5 PEAK: Yes
  5. Water resistance3 ATM vs 5 ATM+67%
  6. Resolution (width)218 px vs 466 px2.1×
  7. Screen size1.1″ vs 1.32″+20%
  8. Pixel density198 ppi vs 353 ppi+78%
  9. Weight39 g vs 36 g+8%
  10. Thickness12.9 mm vs 11.5 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare