NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Smartwatches
  3. Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar
  4. Alternatives

Alternatives to Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar

10 GPS sports watches at a similar price that compete with the T-Rex Dual Solar — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.

Alternatives to the T-Rex Dual Solar

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2
1
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Ultra 2
9.3
15% cheaper ≈ $550
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 30 days vs 25 days
  • Screen size 1.5″ vs 1.32″
  • Battery capacity 870 mAh vs 660 mAh
  • Weight 89.2 g vs 69 g
  • Pixel density 322 ppi vs 353 ppi
Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
2
Amazfit · 2026Cheetah 2 Ultra
9.4
8% cheaper ≈ $600
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 30 days vs 25 days
  • Weight 52 g vs 69 g
  • Screen size 1.5″ vs 1.32″
  • Water resistance 5 ATM vs 10 ATM
  • Pixel density 323 ppi vs 353 ppi
Suunto Vertical 2
3
Suunto · 2025Vertical 2
9.3
Same price ≈ $640
  • Screen size 1.5″ vs 1.32″
  • GPS battery life (dual-band) 65 h vs 41 h
  • Thickness 13.6 mm vs 14.5 mm
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 20 days vs 25 days
  • Weight 87 g vs 69 g
Amazfit Falcon
4
AmazfitFalcon
9.6
23% cheaper ≈ $500
  • Water resistance 20 ATM vs 10 ATM
  • Weight 64 g vs 69 g
  • Thickness 13 mm vs 14.5 mm
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 14 days vs 25 days
  • GPS battery life (dual-band) 21 h vs 41 h
Garmin Enduro 4
5
Garmin · 2026Enduro 4
8.2
38% pricier ≈ $900
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 36 days vs 25 days
  • Screen size 1.4″ vs 1.32″
  • Weight 66 g vs 69 g
  • AMOLED / OLED display
  • Sport profiles 97 vs 180
Suunto Race 2
6
Suunto · 2025Race 2
9.0
22% cheaper ≈ $510
  • Screen size 1.5″ vs 1.32″
  • GPS battery life (dual-band) 55 h vs 41 h
  • Thickness 12.5 mm vs 14.5 mm
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 18 days vs 25 days
  • Sport profiles 95 vs 180
Garmin Fenix 9 51mm
7
Garmin · 2026Fenix 9 51mm
8.6
69% pricier ≈ $1,100
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 29 days vs 25 days
  • Screen size 1.4″ vs 1.32″
  • GPS battery life (dual-band) 45 h vs 41 h
  • Weight 91 g vs 69 g
  • Sport profiles 99 vs 180
Garmin Fenix 9 Pro 51mm
8
Garmin · 2026Fenix 9 Pro 51mm
8.8
85% pricier ≈ $1,200
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 31 days vs 25 days
  • Screen size 1.5″ vs 1.32″
  • GPS battery life (dual-band) 45 h vs 41 h
  • Weight 99 g vs 69 g
  • Sport profiles 99 vs 180
Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro
9
Amazfit · 2025T-Rex 3 Pro
9.6
38% cheaper ≈ $400
  • Screen size 1.5″ vs 1.32″
  • Pixel density 466 ppi vs 353 ppi
  • Battery capacity 700 mAh vs 660 mAh
  • Weight 74.5 g vs 69 g
  • GPS battery life (dual-band) 38 h vs 41 h
Garmin Fenix 9 Pro inReach 51mm
10
8.8
100% pricier ≈ $1,300
  • Battery life (smartwatch mode) 31 days vs 25 days
  • Screen size 1.5″ vs 1.32″
  • GPS battery life (dual-band) 45 h vs 41 h
  • Weight 99 g vs 69 g
  • Sport profiles 99 vs 180
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare