NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Falcon vs Grit X

Amazfit Falcon vs Polar Grit X

What Falcon does better (8) and where Grit X wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit Falcon
AmazfitFalcon
9.6Score
8 advantages≈ $500
Higher score
vs
Polar Grit X
Polar · 2020Grit X
4.0Score
0 advantages≈ $460
6.6Display3.4
5.3Battery life3.5
9.8Sports & outdoor2.2
9.6Build & durability8.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

FalconGrit X
49.4 × 47.21347 × 4713
FalconGrit XDifference
Height47.2 mm47 mm+0.2 mm
Width49.4 mm47 mm+2.5 mm
Thickness13 mm13 mm−0.1 mm
Weight64 g64 g=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Falcon better than Grit X?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)14 days vs 6 days2.3×
  2. Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Grit X: No
  4. GPS battery life38 h vs 35 h+9%
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 240 px+73%
  6. Screen size1.28″ vs 1.2″+7%
  7. Pixel density326 ppi vs 200 ppi+63%
  8. Battery capacity500 mAh vs 345 mAh+45%

Why is Grit X better than Falcon?

Grit X has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare