vs
3.3Display3.3
3.9Smart features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
105 (2023)105 4G
| 105 (2023) | 105 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 115.1 mm | 121 mm | −5.9 mm |
| Width | 49.4 mm | 50 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 14.5 mm | = |
| Weight | 79 g | 80 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 (2023) better than 105 4G?
105 (2023) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is 105 4G better than 105 (2023)?
- LTE (cellular)No · 105 (2023): Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 78.7 g | 80.2 g |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 14.5 mm |
| Height | 115.1 mm | 121 mm |
| Width | 49.4 mm | 50 mm |
| Colours | Red Terracotta, Cyan, Charcoal | Black, Blue, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | 111 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | — | 0.1 GB |
