vs
3.3Display3.3
3.9Smart features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
105 (2023)110 4G 2nd Edition
| 105 (2023) | 110 4G 2nd Edition | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 115.1 mm | 121.5 mm | −6.4 mm |
| Width | 49.4 mm | 50 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 14.4 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 79 g | 94 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 105 (2023) better than 110 4G 2nd Edition?
- Weight78.7 g vs 94.5 g+20%
Why is 110 4G 2nd Edition better than 105 (2023)?
- LTE (cellular)No · 105 (2023): Yes
- Battery capacity1,000 mAh vs 1,450 mAh+45%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 78.7 g | 94.5 g |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 14.4 mm |
| Height | 115.1 mm | 121.5 mm |
| Width | 49.4 mm | 50 mm |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Red Terracotta, Cyan, Charcoal | Midnight Blue, Arctic Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 120 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 160 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | 111 ppi | 111 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,000 mAh | 1,450 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | No | No |
| LTE (cellular) | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | Yes | Yes |
| RAM | — | 0.1 GB |
