NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 265 vs Vantage V3

Garmin Forerunner 265 vs Polar Vantage V3

What Forerunner 265 does better (3) and where Vantage V3 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 265
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265
4.7Score
3 advantages≈ $450
vs
Polar Vantage V3
Polar · 2023Vantage V3
5.6Score
5 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
5.0Display8.3
3.6Battery life5.2
4.9Health tracking8.3
5.0Sports & outdoor2.9
2.8Build & durability3.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 265Vantage V3
46.1 × 46.112.947.3 × 47.313.5
Forerunner 265Vantage V3Difference
Height46.1 mm47.3 mm−1.2 mm
Width46.1 mm47.3 mm−1.2 mm
Thickness12.9 mm13.5 mm−0.6 mm
Weight47 g57 g−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 265 better than Vantage V3?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)13 days vs 11 days+18%
  2. Weight47 g vs 57 g+21%
  3. Thickness12.9 mm vs 13.5 mm+5%

Why is Vantage V3 better than Forerunner 265?

  1. GPS battery life20 h vs 42 h2.1×
  2. Storage8 GB vs 32 GB4×
  3. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.39″+7%
  4. Resolution (width)416 px vs 454 px+9%
  5. Pixel density320 ppi vs 327 ppi+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare