NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Forerunner 265 vs Race 3S

Garmin Forerunner 265 vs Suunto Race 3S

What Forerunner 265 does better (2) and where Race 3S wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Garmin Forerunner 265
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265
4.7Score
2 advantages≈ $450
vs
Suunto Race 3S
Suunto · 2026Race 3S
6.6Score
5 advantages≈ $490
Higher score
5.0Display7.1
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.0Sports & outdoor6.2
2.8Build & durability4.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Forerunner 265Race 3S
46.1 × 46.112.946 × 4611.4
Forerunner 265Race 3SDifference
Height46.1 mm46 mm+0.1 mm
Width46.1 mm46 mm+0.1 mm
Thickness12.9 mm11.4 mm+1.5 mm
Weight47 g56 g−9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Forerunner 265 better than Race 3S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)13 days vs 12 days+8%
  2. Weight47 g vs 56 g+19%

Why is Race 3S better than Forerunner 265?

  1. Storage8 GB vs 64 GB8×
  2. Sapphire crystalNo · Forerunner 265: Yes
  3. Thickness12.9 mm vs 11.4 mm+13%
  4. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
  5. Pixel density320 ppi vs 353 ppi+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare